Much of my growing-up years, Julia Child's show "The French Chef," was on our [black and white] television. The program premiered in 1963 and ran through 1973.



In Crossing to Safety, Wallace Stegner states of writers:
"He turns the conversation to that banal subject, fascinating to non-writers , of why writers write. Ego-enhancement, sure. What else? Psychological imbalance? Neurosis? Trauma? And if trauma, how far can trauma go before it stops being stimulating and becomes destructive?...Are writers reporters, prophets, crazies, entertainers, preachers, judges, what? Who appoints them as mouthpieces? If they appoint themselves, as they clearly do, how valid is the commission?"
Powell found a niche that worked. She took an idea and worked it. She labored, anguished (and anguished) over it. (I think one of the elements of the book that I found unappealing was the amount of complaining about every minor detail of the project.) But was she successful? Absolutely. Her blog evolved into a book which evolved into a movie. Financially, she is rewarded. The success of her project/blog/book/movie has been an impetus to revive the sales of Child's book "Mastering the Art of French Cooking." Bookstores are seeing the book "fly off of the shelves" in record numbers, perhaps rivaling the original release.
I enjoyed the movie immensely. Streep is delightful in her portrayal of Child and Stanley Tucci is adorable in his portrayal of Child's husband, Paul. If you haven't seen it yet (it is now a five buck club movie,) go see it. You won't be disappointed.
In the meantime, I will be reading more of Julie Powell. Her current blog is now favored in my lineup of those I live to read. And I may be reading Julie and Julia again. Even if Shapiro won't give you another chance, Julie, I will.
P.S. My favorite movie moment is always obscure. In this movie, there were two favortie obscure moments. First, when Julie and her friend are in the bar and her friend tells her that she is a b*tch. It takes a good friend to be able to tell you that. The second obscure moment that I loved was when Julia and Avis met after being pen pals for eight years. I instantly thought of meeting Mindy, Kate, Nina, or Alicia- all women whose blogs I read. They inspire me, cheer me, warm my heart and on occaision, I am fortunate enough to "talk" to them via the internet. The scene when Avis puts her arms out for a hug and says to Julia "look at you!" just made me have goose bumps.
3 comments:
I think what bothered me most about the book was that Julie was not cooking in the spirit of Julia Child. She wasn't cooking for the love of cooking, she was doing it to get through a self-assigned project. If she had loved cooking, I probably would have enjoyed the book more. I might give the movie a chance once it's out on DVD... and at the library for free.
P.S. Has anyone talked about starting up a new book club lately?
Great post! I can't wait to watch the movie1
I loved both the movie and the book, and I thought Ms. Streep's performance was so great. I thought the part of Julie could have been played a little bit edgier, but I enjoyed that role too.
I think the blogger Julie, did convey a love of food and cooking, and that's why she chose to devote herself to that particular subject to blog about. She thought that if she blogged about something that she loved, then she could stay with it for the time required? But, maybe I read it differently. I think it's interesting how often people can read the same thing, and come away from it with different ways of interpreting it.
I'm looking forward to the DVD, so I can see it again!
Post a Comment